In youth basketball, the word “big” gets thrown around way too loosely. Boys side, girls side, it does not matter.
Tall kid equals post. Tall kid equals rebound, screen, and stay by the basket.
That habit is stunting development.
A kid being 6’0 in eighth grade or 6’3 as a freshman does not automatically mean “post player.” It means taller than the room they are currently in. In a lot of cases, that same kid is going to be a wing or a guard at the next levels they touch.
And if the most important development years get spent playing one role for convenience, the athlete pays for it later.
Where youth basketball gets it wrong
Grassroots basketball often trains for the present, not the next level.
A tall kid gets thrown in the paint because it helps the team win right now.
A tall kid gets taught “play big” because it is convenient regardless of frame, and ability.
A tall kid gets praised for size instead of skill.
Then two years later, the same kid hits a level where everyone is tall and everyone is strong. Now the game demands mobility, decision-making, and versatility. And those same adults will sit back and say “All that height and the kid never developed”.
I’m sure we have all heard it before or even have been guilty of thinking it.
The mindset shift
Height is a measurement. “Big” is a role and a job description.
At higher levels, being a real “big” is usually a combination of frame, movement, touch, physicality, and defensive responsibility. A 6’10, 195-pound athlete is not the same development project as a 6’10, 240-pound athlete, even if they share a height.
Treating them the same because they are tall is how athletes get misused.
Two problems I keep seeing
Problem 1: Tall for the level becomes “post by default”
This is the 6’0 to 6’4 middle school and early high school group, plus late bloomers who may not keep growing. They dominate as a youth post, then hit a level where they are no longer the biggest player. Now the position changes, the floor shrinks, and the athlete looks “behind” even though they were never developed for what comes next.
Problem 2: True bigs never get modern big development
This is the 6’8 to 7’0 group who only touches the ball off the glass and never gets taught how the next level actually uses size. Guards get the touches, bigs get the cleanup, and development becomes accidental.
In countless gyms, I’ve watched 6’7 to 6’9 athletes struggle with the simplest next-level requirement: catch, make a quick decision, and finish without panicking. That is where the travels, charges, and turnovers come from. Not because they are not talented. Because the reps were never built in.
This is why I don’t treat “big” like a single category.
I put together a mini guide that separates the two most common tall profiles I see in gyms, and what typically gets missed with each. It’s called Height With a Plan.
What tall players should be getting early, without overcomplicating it
Not every tall player needs the same exact development plan, but there are some early signs that tell you whether real development is happening or whether size is just covering things up.
Offense: catch clean, stay on balance, make the next play
For some bigs, that means finishing strong, screening with force, and making simple short roll reads. For others, it may mean spacing, attacking a closeout, or making the next pass without holding the offense up. Either way, the common thread is this: the player cannot be a possession stopper. Bigger players have to be able to catch, process, and make the next decision with purpose.
Defense: protect where they are supposed to protect, and move where they are supposed to move
It is not just about blocking shots. It is about whether the player can handle the actual defensive responsibility that comes with the body type and projected role. Can they protect the rim if they are a true big? Can they survive actions and space if they are more mobile? Can they communicate and stay connected to the coverage instead of just reacting late?
In the Height With A Plan Mini Guide I break down offensive and defensive priorities by archetype and projected role, but those two ideas alone will tell you a lot. Is the player learning how to help a possession, or just getting by because they are taller than everybody else right now?
What to ask programs before committing a tall athlete
You do not need a long list. You need a few questions that tell you whether the program actually knows how to develop size.
How do you develop taller players based on what they may become, not just what they are right now?
This gets to projection. Are they developing a future 4, 5, 4/5, or big wing, or just using the player where they can dominate today?
What defensive responsibilities are your taller players expected to handle here?
You want to hear more than “protect the rim.” Can they explain coverages, movement, communication, and how the player is being prepared to defend at a higher level?
Who are some taller players you have developed, and how did their game grow over time?
Not just stats. Not just wins. How did the player’s actual game expand?
A quick reality check for the adults
The reason we respect the great bigs like David Robinson, Shaq, Hakeem Olajuwon, Kevin Durant, Nikola Jokic, and Wemby is not height. It is skill at size. It is decision-making. It is versatility. The game is changing. Evaluation is changing. Development has to change with it.
A lot of taller athletes are still being developed for convenience instead of translation. They are being taught what helps them look useful right now, not what will help them function later when the game gets faster, more physical, and more demanding.
That is why I put together Height With a Plan, a short guide to tall athlete development that breaks this conversation into two tracks: the player who is tall for the level right now, and the true big body who needs more intentional modern big development. From there, it gets into what next-level size actually means, the different archetypes staffs are evaluating, and why track record matters so much when choosing coaches, trainers, and environments.
This article is just one part of a short series I’m writing on taller athletes, because because this topic has more layers than most people realize. And if anyone is paying attention to college and the NBA you can see the game is getting ‘Big-ger’
In this post you’ll be able download the free Height With A Plan Mini Guide.


